A charity foundation run by Didier Drogba, is being investigated over “serious regulatory concerns” by the Charity Commission.
The Daily Mail claimed that just £14,115 out of £1.7m donated to the Didier Drogba Foundation has gone to good causes in his native Africa.
Former Chelsea striker Drogba, 38, is threatening legal action and called the Mail’s story “false and defamatory”.
In a statement, the Ivorian added: “There is no fraud, no corruption, no mismanagement and no lies.”
Drogba, who plays for Canadian Major League Soccer club Montreal Impact, accused the Mail journalists of “jeopardising the lives of many thousands of African children”.
The Didier Drogba Foundation was launched in the UK in 2009 when the former Ivory Coast captain was playing for Chelsea.
In the article, the Mail claimed that £439,321 was spent putting on lavish fundraising parties attended by celebrities, and more than £1m languished in bank accounts.
But the foundation told the Mail it had a separate organisation with the same name set up in the Ivory Coast which had funded several charitable projects in Africa since 2007.
In his statement, Drogba listed the accomplishments of his foundation, including building a mobile clinic, investing in orphanages, and funding the purchase of school bags, books and a dialysis machine.
|Drogba’s Chelsea medal tally|
|Premier League (4): 2004-05, 2005-06, 2009-10, 2014-15|
|Champions League (1): 2011-12|
|FA Cup (4): 2006-07, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2011-12|
|League Cup (3): 2004-05, 2006-07, 2014-15|
He added: “I come from a poor family and I had to work hard to get where I am today, but this would mean nothing to me if I wasn’t able to give back to my country, my continent and my community.”
In its statement, the Charity Commission said it had “concerns about the administration of the charity and the oversight provided by trustees, all of whom appear to live abroad, as well as allegations that the charity has provided misleading information to donors and the public.
“Further, the charity has raised and accumulated significant sums of money that have not yet been spent and further information is required over the plans to spend those funds.
“All these issues merit further investigation by the Commission.”